How to handle possibly lifesaving OOS batches of ATMP - A question that concerns manufacturers and authorities
![Pharmaceutical Biotechnology for Non-Biotechnologists](files/eca/userImages/training.img/Z-ECA-Pharmaceutical-Biotechnology-Non-Biotechnologists.jpg)
Recommendation
9/10 October 2024
Berlin, Germany
An Overview and Insight in Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
What happens to an ATMP that is just out of specification? Can it still be released based on a risk assessment? Don't the current guidelines even provide this possibility?
As a fictitious example: Is a product that might have to contain at least 50,000 cells according to the specification no longer effective if it contains only 48,000 cells? May I then still apply the ATMP to the patient, if it can be life saving? Who will do the assessment and decision on release - manufacturer, physician or both? How do you document such a process?
This topic occupied not only the participants of an expert workshop on 25 June in Vienna, conducted by the ATMP Interest Group of the ECA Foundation, but experts and authorities worldwide.
In Practice
An example from practice is already available from the USA. It concerns Kymriah, a Novartis product that received FDA approval in 2017. Due to the complexity of the manufacturing process, Novartis has batches of this product that do not meet the specification. These were deviations due to cell variability and the number of inactive cells in the treatment of relapsed large B-cell lymphoma. However, due to the severity of the disease, some physicians wanted to use these OOS batches on their patients, as this would be preferable to non-treatment in the context of a risk assessment. Subsequently, in consultation with the FDA, the corresponding doses were made available free of charge for treatment as part of a compassionate use program.
EMA Support
The EMA recently published a Questions and Answers paper entitled "Questions and answers on the use of out-of-specification batches of authorised cell/tissue-based advanced therapy medicinal products" as a first guidance to these questions, particularly taking into account Section 11.5 of the ATMP Guidelines, which states that in special circumstances the administration of a cell/tissue-based ATMP that does not meet the specifications laid down in the marketing authorisation may be considered in order to avoid an immediate significant risk to the patient. The document addresses questions of responsibility, documentation and notification to the EMA and also states that the patient must be informed in an understandable way, but that this does not relieve the manufacturer of his responsibility.
Related GMP News
29.05.2024New FDA Draft Guideline regarding the Use of Human- and Animal-derived Materials
22.05.2024New FDA Draft Guideline regarding Safety Testing of human allogeneic Cells
07.05.2024Final Approval of SoHO Regulation
07.05.2024FDA Warning Letter to a Biotechnology Company in China
07.05.2024Update of Guideline on Epidemiological Data
05.03.2024FDA Warning Letter on misbranded and unapproved Drugs