Should Equipment Status Identification Labels be retained with the Batch Record?

Recommendation
29/30 April 2025
Hamburg, Germany
Batch Manufacturing Documents: from Preparation to Operational Excellence
Keeping equipment status identification labels with the batch record or other files is often done to provide additional confirmation during review of the record. It supports verification that certain equipment was cleaned before usage for manufacturing. But is it required?
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration FDA has answered this question in a Q&A Document. Assuming each major piece of equipment has a unique "Cleaning and Use Log" that is adequately retained, these "quick reference" equipment labels can be discarded according to the agency. FDA sees "no value in the retention of such labels in addition to the required equipment log or batch record documentation. The labels serve a valuable, temporary purpose of positively identifying the current status of equipment and the material under process. Any status label should be correct, legible, readily visible, and associated with the correct piece of equipment. The information on the temporary status label should correspond with the information recorded in the equipment cleaning and use log, or the previous batch record for non-dedicated equipment."
However, as said before, it might be useful to keep these labels in a batch record. Many companies are doing so; not because it is a requirement but it is a helpful and reliable practice.
Related GMP News
23.04.2025New WHO Guideline Package: TRS 1060 published
16.04.2025EMA: QPs must provide a written final Assessment and Approval of Third-Party Audit Reports
15.04.2025Strategic Report published by the Critical Medicines Alliance
09.04.2025EMA's Plans for the next three Years
09.04.2025Q&A Document on QP Declaration updated
02.04.2025Switzerland: Update of the Technical Interpretation on the PQR